GoForLaw - Your gateway to legal information
Legal Article - DEA Sub-Informants Entrap Friends

Dimitry Tsimberg, Esq.

Federal Judge Finds DEA Used Paid ''Sub-Informants'' to Entrap Their Friends?


In a stunning revelation, which may have far reaching consequences on drug cases in Southern California, it was discovered that the DEA and other local law enforcement agencies have been subsidizing an unofficial and secret drug informant "ring." Apparently, "confidential sub-informants" were paid to deliver successful drug transactions and may have entrapped people into criminal activities.

To make matters look even more sinister, the Government is refusing to produce records concerning the "ring's" functions and activities in Southern California . Consequently, a criminal indicment against 3 defendants for drug trafficking was recently thrown out by a Federal Judge. The Government denied knowing about the use of confidential "sub-informants," but the Judge found this claim to be "highly unlikely" and "repeatedly proven to be unrealiable.

As a paid informant for the Drug Enforcement Administration, Guillermo Francisco Jordan-Pollito has achieved a remarkable record of success. Over the last 10 years, according to his own testimony in Los Angeles federal court, the former Mexican police officer has earned more than $400,000 in cash helping the DEA, the FBI, the Secret Service, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, the California Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement, the L.A. County Sheriff's Department, and the Santa Ana Police Department put together numerous cases against suspected sellers of cocaine, methamphetamines and other illicit drugs.

There's just one thing missing from that picture. The DEA's star undercover operative used a stable of his own paid informants to assist him in setting up drug buys, a fact that was kept from defense lawyers in an undetermined number of those cases.

Incredibly, these "sub-informants" were paid only if they successfully set up a "buy," fueling charges of entrapment. The network encouraged people to contact former "school days" friends and ask them where to buy drugs, which was allegedly for their "boss." Arguably, these practices may lead an otherwise law abiding citizen to criminally aid an "old school friend" set up a drug buy, especially after repeated pressure and phone calls.

In the case at issue, there was evidence of numerous phone calls between these "sub-informants" and defendants. However, none of these set-ups were recorded, leading to "an inference that pressure was being brought to bear by the sub-informant, which could have been used to support an entrapment defense." Ronald O. Kaye, a former federal public defender now in private practice, uncovered Jordan-Pollito's use of "sub-informants" last year after combing through telephone records turned over to him by federal prosecutors in a methamphetamine-trafficking case.

U.S. District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper stated: "A law enforcement agency must not be allowed to shield itself from accountability by hiring someone outside of law enforcement who is free to violate citizens' rights."

For further information, read the Order Dismissing Indictment in the U.S. v. Alvarez case.

This post is for educational and information purposes only. It is not legal advice on any particular case, and merely a general opinion of one California lawyer. You should not rely on it without consulting a competent attorney in your area about your specific case and facts. It is not intended to, and shall not, create an attorney-client relationship. So, be happy you got some free info and use your grey matter!


Need our expertise?

Ask a Lawyer - got a question? Post your case or legal issue for FREE and receive e-mail responses from lawyers.

Legal Articles - read articles written by attorneys about a variety of legal issues.

Business Issues - 15 things every business owner should think about, obtain legal advice on, and have an attorney ready to address and resolve.

  What clients have said about me
"I was looking for a good lawyer to handle my case, which had some complications. I found Dimitry, who was very professional, helpful and cool. His personal attention to my case helped me win a fair settlement. Thank you Dimitry ... I hope that other people take advantage of your talents!"
-- Hugo (Los Angeles, CA)

"I was reluctant to use an 'internet lawyer,' but was very happy to work with Dimitry, who helped me immensely with several business and legal issues. Dimitry is knowledgeable, experienced and results-oriented. I highly recommend him!"
-- Joyce (San Diego, CA)

"Dimitry helped me with many business issues and problems, freeing me from worrying about legal matters and allowing me to concentrate on making my business successful. I wish everyone had a trusted advisior like Dimitry, and I wish I had found him sooner."
-- Mike (Los Angeles, CA)

"Thank you so very much for the information you provided me. I've been lying awake for nights trying to figure this out. Tonight I'll rest a lot better thanks to you."
-- Mark (Riverside, CA)

This testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.

  Did you know?


All content on this website is general information only, and is to be used only for educational purposes. It is not a substitute for legal advice from a competent attorney in your area that is specific to your case, and you should not rely on any information on this website without first obtaining such legal advice. Use of this website (including of any posted content) shall not create an attorney-client relationship between you and GoForLaw.com or any author(s). GoForLaw.com is not responsible for any information placed on this website by third-parties, and any posts, information or other content is merely the opinion of the author(s), and not of GoForLaw.com. Please read the full Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy - by accessing this website, you agree to abide by them.

Copyright © 2004-2010 GoForLaw.com - All Rights Reserved